September 06, 2006

Breaking the Law, Breaking The Law

It seems nobody is enjoying these, but my one regular commenter goaded me into a shorter Presidential speech for today's shocking revelations; i.e. we were breaking the law and we intend to keep on doing it. I may peter out as I attempt a second shortening in two days, but it's all for one very special, sick little kid in Houston (for a full, legal analysis of the proposed bill mentioned in the speech, check here for amazingness):

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all for coming and forming a terrorism-victim shield around me. September 11th. September 11th. Towers down. Box-cutters. Action time!

They're still out there. But we're safe because of all the things I've done. But not safe. It's a real chin-scratcher. But we are bringing everybody to justice without actually doing anything remotely justice-related, and many times to a bunch of people who had nothing to do with anything. That shows you how serious we are.

So serious that we set up secret prisons and some not-secret prisons with lots of secret things, things so juicy that those notorious gossips in the Red Cross couldn't even get to them. Those guys are always saying "He should have water" or "Maybe you shouldn't suspend him by his shoulders for 48 hours at a time" and blah blah blah.

Some of the detainees said bad things. Maybe it was after we held them for four years without charges and for no reason, maybe it was before. Who knows? Now the double-super-secret detainees: they really are terrorists. So bad that we can't even charge them with anything because the charges would eat right through the paper and onto the floor and through the floor towards the center of the Earth like the blood of that Queen Bitch alien.

I'm going to tell you know how bad these guys are through the example of one guy, but me tell you all these details it isn't divulging anything important, because it became unimportant and non-securitally compromising the moment I decided to utter it, and midterm electoral success trumps security. The illegal ends justify the means. Really, our hands were tied, and by ours I mean theirs and very uncomfortably. Honestly, you'd all be dead if we hadn't had done this in exactly this way, and I don't want to hear any back-sass from any of you.

Which is why we're entirely changing the perfectly legal, maximally effective thing we were doing. The non-torture torture was absolutely essential to producing the dividends paid by the program. If we didn't non-torture torture, and instead just non-tortured, God only knows how many smoking craters would be dotting our great landscape.

By the way, that shit down in Cuba: also totally legal, despite what every person who doesn't get paid by the White House. And those rotten Supreme Court justices. So we'll try again, and see if we can't stick an infected finger in those robed tyrants' eyes, aye what, mate?

So here's the long and short of it: they get lawyers (boo!).. I know, I know... they're presumed innocent (laughter), and they get food and medical care (shrill hissing). But don't worry, we know they're guilty and a hand-picked tribunal hearing limited evidence and denying basic fairness protocols will know that as well. Maybe. Because frankly I don't care what happens after I'm in office.

Now that everyone finally disagrees with our methods, it's time to pass this vitally important legislation so that the world can now that a slim majority of partisan legislators right before a midterm election also agree with us.

September 11th. Think of your grandchildren, whether they exist or not.




Posted by Norbizness at September 6, 2006 04:30 PM
Comments

I found it a bit odd that the President received a standing ovation when he announced the names of detainees that had been transferred to Guantanamo for prosecution. Isn't he the same person that has been preventing this type of prosecution? It seems to me that saying "It's about time" would be the more appropriate response to this announcement. The only thing we've gained from the delay of this outcome is the ire of much of the world and a loss of the moral authority that 9/11 most certainly provided.

The fact that these "high profile" names were released...and that one might presume that these individuals will be paraded in the media for all to see...almost immediately after the President and the GOP have just rolled out their campaign strategy for the November midterm election seems all too convenient. Granted, it may well be coincidental but I'm not convinced. Nothing would serve the President better than having Americans see some "tangible" results of our effort to fight the war on terror.

Read more here:

www.thoughttheater.com

Posted by: Daniel DiRito at September 6, 2006 05:45 PM

This is good because now I don't have to feel guilty because I didn't listen when I heard him on the news. I did however enjoy the tune played right after the cut. "There stands the glass". ???


www.ckua.ca

Posted by: Pony at September 6, 2006 06:16 PM

Man, that was like a hot knife on butter.

Plus I hadn't thought about Priest in a couple of days.

Posted by: kcb at September 6, 2006 07:12 PM

Those detainees are all bad guys? I didn't know that. Kewl.

I'm good now.

Posted by: Montag at September 6, 2006 08:26 PM

between the last two "Ax Da Presidents", you have probably covered everything Shrub is going to say over and over for the next couple months. it's sad really.

Posted by: funkyb0ss at September 7, 2006 12:57 AM

I like to consider myself a semi-regular commenter, although the only reason I come here is because I like to clip coupons and an Altavista search brought me here back in '95.

Does anyone have any Sara Lee coupons?

Back on topic, I couldn't help but read this as being said by Chris Parnell, and I wanted it to say at the end LIVE FROM NEW YORK etc. I don't know if I'm trying to say I found your piece amusing or NOT amusing. That's the conundrum of SNL.

So I pretty much spent a lot of time not commenting on your article. Keep up the good work, mein kapitan.

Posted by: ChrisV82 at September 7, 2006 01:52 AM

so, with this all this in mind, does this mean that that john karr guy can now say his merely enjoys "alternative" sex?

Posted by: dexter at September 7, 2006 12:54 PM